To continue in the area of sophistry, this charming argument, reasoning that, starting from true premises, or regarded as such, and obeying the rules of logic leads to an improper inference, to not tell rgument, reasoning that the appearance of validity, truth, but in fact false and inconclusive, generally advanced in bad faith to mislead or deceive, we will assume that the phrase "beauty is ugly and evil good "is checked and acquired. Take the first part first: the beautiful is ugly. Taken in this sense, although that support is the beautiful is ugly, and not vice versa. What remains is ugly ugly. But what is beautiful, by cons is ugly, which does not include the relativity of judgments, yet so well known in this field. Everything is ugly. But what it means ugly? Is it just something which by its shape, color, appearance, lack of harmony, is unpleasant to see and strike the idea that it is the beautiful? Or will it further? And if not, we must know what the good to understand the exact meaning of the ugly: the beautiful is something causing a deep impression can be admired because of its superior qualities than the standard or average, it could be argued that there is no standard or average , and nothing is more capable of attracting the admiration that we can put on the account of blase usually due to the internet.
For that which is the second part: evil is good, we can deduce, first, that right is right, what is already reassuring, and, secondly, that there is more evil. But what is evil? The definitions are varied, leaving us so many possibilities as to the interpretation of this phrase: it wants to say is having trouble? Or doing something considered wrong by the laws or systhème values of a given culture is actually good? I leave you the choice, but please let me know, as a new interpretation, which I do not think, would have Escape on.
So all is well and everything is ugly. A new paradox or a universal truth?
0 comments:
Post a Comment